Abstract

As business organisations strive for progression, their direction will often be guided by an aspirational vision or mission but articulated in the form of business objectives, business strategy and the stewardship and policy to deliver them. These will include the allocation of complementary assets, which need to be combined through the strategy setting process. Such assets may include technological know-how but also distribution channels, process or system capabilities or competence across value chain activities such as after sales service. To be effective will require coherence—an alignment between expectation and reality; congruence—where elements of the strategy are integrated and reinforce each other; and consistency—between intention and action. In this regard there is an essential understanding within the organisation that the performance of the whole organisation will be improved when there is complementarity between elements of business strategy. Hence, complementarities will be sought for example between the finance strategy and the marketing strategy or between the production strategy the people or human resources strategy. Complementarity is the antithesis of singularity. The hypothesis is that single issue competitive advantage may not be the only option available to organisations in future. As such, prosperity will not only come about by pace and agility; or by cost leadership or differentiation; but by the ability to make sure that every investment creates advantage across the whole organisation; and that such investments are mutually reinforcing.

Keywords

  • Business strategy
  • Competitive progression
  • Alignment
  • Agility

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ahlstrad, B., Lampel, J., & Mintzberg, H. (1998). Strategy Safari. Pearson.

  • Aral, S., & Weill, P. (2007). IT assets, organizational capabilities, and firm performance: How resource allocations and organizational differences explain performance variation. Organisation Science, 18(5), 763–780.

  • Arranz, N., Arroyabe, M. F., Li, J., & de Arroyabe, J. C. F. (2019). An integrated model of organisational innovation and firm performance: Generation, persistence and complementarity. Journal of Business Research, 105, 270.

  • Aversa, P., Furnari, S., & Haefliger, S. (2015). Business model configurations and performance: A qualitative comparative analysis in formula one racing, 2005–2013. Industrial and Corporate Change, 24(3), 655–676.

  • Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1) 99–120.

  • Barney, J. B., & Clarke, D. N. (2007). Resource based theory. Oxford University Press.

  • Bartoloni, E., & Baussola, M. (2018). Driving business performance: Innovation complementarities and persistence patterns. Industry and Innovation, 25(5), 505–525.

  • BCG. (2020). BCG global survey: What is factory of the future? Author Sean Galea-Pace. https://manufacturingglobal.com/digital-factory/bcg-global-survey-what-factory-future

  • Bohr, N. (1929 [1961]). Atomic theory and the description of nature. Cambridge University Press.

  • Camisón, C., Puig, D. A., Forés, B., Fabra, M. E., Muñoz, A., & Muñoz Martínez, C. (2016). The importance of internal resources and capabilities and destination resources to explain firm competitive position in the Spanish tourism industry. International Journal of Tourism Research, 18(4), 341–356.

  • Cao, G., Wiengarten, F., & Humphreys, P. (2011). Towards a contingency resource-based view of IT business value. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 24(1), 85.

  • Cardinal, L. B., Kreutzer, M., & Miller, C. C. (2017). An aspirational view of organizational control research: Re–invigorating empirical work to better meet the challenges of 21st century organizations. The Academy of Management Annals, 11(2), 559–592.

  • Cassiman, B., & Veugelers, R. (2006). In search of complementarity in innovation strategy: Internal R&D and external knowledge acquisition. Management Science, 52(1), 68–82.

  • Cozzarin, B. P., & Percival, J. C. (2006). Complementarities between organisational strategies and innovation. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 15(3), 195–217.

  • Darwish, T. K., Wood, G., Singh, S., & Singh, R. (2019). Human resource Management in India: Performance and complementarity. European Management Review, 17, 3830389.

  • Deken, F., Berends, H., Gemser, G., & Lauche, K. (2018). Strategizing and the initiation of interorganizational collaboration through prospective resourcing. Academy of Management Journal, 61(5), 1920–1950.

  • Deloitte. (2020). The fourth industrial revolution at the intersection of readiness and responsibility. DeloitteInsights. https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/de/Documents/human-capital/DeloitteReview26Fourth_Industrial_Revolution.pdf

  • Denrell, J., Fang, C., & Winter, S. G. (2003). The economics of strategic opportunity. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10), 977–990.

  • Di Giannatale, P., & Passarelli, F. (2018). Integration contracts and asset complementarity: Theory and evidence from US data. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 61, 192–222.

  • Feizabadi, J., Gligor, D. M., & Alibakhshi, S. (2021). Examining the synergistic effect of supply chain agility, adaptability and alignment: A complementarity perspective. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 26(4), 514–531.

  • Fiske, A. P. (2000). Complementarity theory: Why human social capacities evolved to require cultural complements. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4(1), 76–94.

  • Gerdin, J., Johansson, T., & Wennblom, G. (2019). The contingent nature of complementarity between results and value-based controls for managing company-level profitability: A situational strength perspective. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 79.

  • Gonzalez-Blanco, J., Vila-Alonso, M., & Guisado-González, G. (2019). Exploring the complementarity between foreign technology, embedded technology and increase of productive capacity. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 25(1).

  • Grimpe, C., & Hussinger, K. (2014). Resource complementarity and value capture in firm acquisitions: The role of intellectual property rights. Strategic Management Journal, 35(12), 1762–1780.

  • Haefliger, S., Hueller, F., & Reza, D. (2020). Customer complementarity in the digital space: Exploring Amazon’s business model diversification. Academy of Management Proceedings 1.

  • Harrison, J. S., Hitt, M. A., Hoskisson, R. E., & Ireland, R. D. (2001, November 1). Resource complementarity in business combinations: Extending the logic to organizational alliances. Journal of Management, 27(6), 679.

  • Ho, J., Plewa, C., & Lu, V. N. (2016). Examining strategic orientation complementarity using multiple regression analysis and fuzzy set QCA. Journal of Business Research, 69(6), 2199–2205.

  • Hsu, P.-F. (2013). Integrating ERP and e-business: Resource complementarity in business value creation. Decision Support Systems, 56, 334–347.

  • Hughes, P., Hodgkinson, I. R., Elliott, K., & Hughes, M. (2018). Strategy, operations, and profitability: The role of resource orchestration. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 38(4), 1125–1143.

  • Hullova, D., Trott, P., & Simms, C. D. (2016). Uncovering the reciprocal complementarity between product and process innovation. Research Policy, 45(5), 929–940.

  • Jackson, G., & Ni, N. (2013). Understanding complementarities as organizational configurations: Using set theoretical methods. Configurational Theory and Methods in Organizational Research, 38.

  • Jiung-Yee Lee, J., Randall, T., Jen-Hwa Hu, P., & Wu, A. (2014). Examining complementary effects of IT investment on firm profitability: Are complementarities the missing link? Information Systems Management, 31(3–4), 340–352.

  • Lanteri, A. (2021). Strategic drivers for the fourth industrial revolution. Thunderbird International Business Review, 63(3), 273–283.

  • Liu, Y., Wang, X., & Ren, W. (2020). A bundling sales strategy for a two-stage supply chain based on the complementarity elasticity of imperfect complementary products. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 35(6), 983–1000.

  • Marcela, M., Lori, D., Panos, D., & AMSIB (CEDIS), Lectoraat Urban Economic Innovation and Kenniscentrum CAREM. (2016). When do acquirers invest in the R&D assets of acquired science-based firms in cross-border acquisitions?: The role of technology and capabilities similarity and complementarity. Long Range Planning, 49(2), 221–240.

  • Markard, J., & Hoffmann, V. H. (2016). Analysis of complementarities: Framework and examples from the energy transition. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 111, 63–75.

  • Milgrom, P., & Roberts, J. (1990). The economics of modern manufacturing: Technology, strategy, and organization. The American Economic Review, 80(3), 511–528.

  • Mintzberg, H. (1978). Patterns in strategy formation. Management Science, 24, 934–948. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.24.9.934

  • Mintzberg, H. (1987). Crafting strategy. Harvard Business Review.

  • Mintzberg, H. (2011). Managing. FT Prentice Hall.

  • Monteiro, R. L., Souza, M., de Souza, F., & Sampaio, R. R. (2020). Complementarity of strategic assets. Obra Digital, 19, 149–166.

  • Moreno, V., Ferreira, R., & Filardi, F. (2020). Dynamic capabilities and complementarity in complex it projects in Brazil: Dataprev’s experience. Americana de Estrategia, 3, 6.

  • Mothe, C., Nguyen-Thi, U., & Van P. N. (2015) Assessing complementarity in organizational innovations for technological innovation: The role of knowledge management practices. Applied Economics. Taylor and Francis (Routledge) 47(29) 3040–3058.

  • Nielsen, S. B., & Hunter, D. E. K. (2013). Challenges to and forms of complementarity between performance management and evaluation. In S. B. Nielsen & D. E. K. Hunter (Eds.), Performance management and evaluation (Vol. 137, pp. 115–123). New Directions for Evaluation.

  • Oedzes, J. J., Van der Vegt, G. S., Rink, F. A., & Walter, F. (2018). On the origins of informal hierarchy: The interactive role of formal leadership and task complexity. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 40(3), 311–324.

  • Pang, C., Wang, Q., Li, Y., & Duan, G. (2019). Integrative capability, business model innovation and performance: Contingent effect of business strategy. European Journal of Innovation Management, 22(3), 541–561.

  • Ployhart, R. E., Nyberg, A. J., Reilly, G., & Maltarich, M. A. (2014). Human capital is dead; long live human capital resources! Journal of Management, 40(2), 371–398.

  • Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy. The Free Press.

  • Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage. The Free Press.

  • Queiroz, M., Tallon, P. P., Coltman, T., Sharma, R., & Reynolds, P. (2020). Aligning the IT portfolio with business strategy: Evidence for complementarity of corporate and business unit alignment. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 29(3) 4–21.

  • Reimer, M., Doorn, S., & Heyden, M. L. M. (2018). Unpacking functional experience complementarities in senior leaders’ influences on CSR strategy: A CEO–top management team approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 151(4), 977–995.

  • Rumelt, R. (2011). Good strategy, bad strategy. Profile Books.

  • Schweiger, S. A., Stettler, T. R., Baldauf, A., & Zamudio, C. (2019). The complementarity of strategic orientations: A meta-analytic synthesis and theory extension. Strategic Management Journal, 40(11), 1822–1851.

  • Sirmon, D. G., Hitt, M. A., Ireland, R. D., & Gilbert, B. A. (2011). Resource orchestration to create competitive advantage: Breadth, depth, and life cycle effects. Journal of Management, 37(5), 1390–1412.

  • Srivastava, S., & D’Souza, D. (2021). Measuring strategic thinking in organizations. Journal of Managerial Issues, 33(1), 90–111.

  • Stieglitz, N., & Heine, K. (2007). Innovations and the role of complementarities in a strategic theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 28(1), 1–15.

  • Suoniemi, S., Meyer-Waarden, L., Munzel, A., Zablah, A. R., & Straub, D. (2020). Big data and firm performance: The roles of market-directed capabilities and business strategy. Information and Management, 57(7) 1–17.

  • Zhang, T., & Zhao, S. (2010). The business measurement of industrial complementarity: A methodology perspective. 2nd IEEE International Conference on Information Management and Engineering, 293–296.

  • Turner, P. A. (2021). The making of the modern manager. Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Wang, N., Xiao, M., & Savin, I. (2021). Complementarity effect in the innovation strategy: Internal R&D and acquisition of capital with embodied technology. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 46(2), 459.

  • Wolfson, M. A., & Mathieu, J. E. (2018). Sprinting to the finish: Toward a theory of human capital resource complementarity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103(11), 1165–1180.

  • Wolfson, M. A., & Mathieu, J. E. (2021). Deploying human capital resources: Accentuating effects of situational alignment and social capital resources. Academy of Management Journal, 64(2), 435–457.

  • Woudstra, U., Berghout, E., & Chee-Wee Tan, van Eekeren, P., & Deden, G. (2017). Resource complementarity and IT economies of scale: Mechanisms and empirical evidence. Information Systems Management, 34(2), 185–199.

  • Yang, M.-J. (2021). The interdependence imperative: Business strategy, complementarities, and economic policy. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 37(2), 392–415.

  • Yoder, M. E. (2019). Better together: Complementarity between theory and practice in strategic management education. Journal of Education for Business, 94(5), 324–332.

  • Zhou, J., Liu, Z., Li, J., & Jiao, H. (2019). Technology complementarity and collaborative innovation: The moderating effects of IT adoption. IEEE International Symposium on Innovation and Entrepreneurship (TEMS-ISIE).

Rights and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Turner, P. (2022). Complementarity and Business Strategy. In: Complementarity in Organizations. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10654-5_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10654-5_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-10653-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-10654-5

  • eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)

You are watching: Complementarity and Business Strategy. Info created by GBee English Center selection and synthesis along with other related topics.