duu u2as before. Secondly, there is the potential only for slight technical advantage in choosing for-mula (2) over formula (1). An identical integral will need to be computed whetherwe use (1) or (2). The only difference in the required differentiation and integrationoccurs in the computation of du versus dU. In our example, for instance, we differen-tiated u = x1/2 rather than U = x−1/2.Acknowledgment. The author wishes to thank Cal Poly Pomona student Victor Reynolds forhis insightful idea.Reference1. J. Stewart, Calculus: Early Transcendentals, 4th ed., Brooks/Cole, 1999. ◦Estimating Deﬁnite IntegralsNorton Starr ([email protected]), Amherst College, Amherst, MA 01002 Many deﬁnite integrals arising in practice can be difﬁcult or impossible to evaluatein ﬁnite terms. Series expansions and numerical integration are two standard ways todeal with the situation. Another approach, primitive but often very effective, yieldscruder estimates by replacing a nasty integrand with nice functions that majorize orare majorized by it. With luck and skill, the bounds achieved sufﬁce for the task athand. I was introduced to this method as a grad student instructor over forty years ago,when I had the good fortune to learn some innovative teaching methods from ArthurMattuck. His supplementary notes for MIT’s calculus course included a section onthe estimation of deﬁnite integrals by an approach barely covered in texts back then.Many ﬁrst year calculus texts of that era touched on the method in connection withcomparison tests for improper integrals, but they seldom did anything with properintegrals. The situation has improved somewhat in recent years, with prominent texts at leastmentioning the basic idea within the chapter introducing the deﬁnite integral. Some-times this is labeled the “Domination Rule” or “Comparison Property”. An informalsurvey shows that most such books offer very few, if any, exercises in the method,usually relatively trivial ones. The texts by Edwards & Penney [1] and Stewart [4] areexceptional in providing more than a token selection of such problems. Unfortunately,their exercises are duplicated in the early transcendental versions of these two texts,thus making no use of the broader array of available functions. Here is a sketch of the way I develop this form of estimation in my intermediate cal-culus course. All integrals are understood to be over a closed, bounded interval [a, b]60 c THE MATHEMATICAL ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA

A Quotient Rule Integration by Parts Formula

Description: A Quotient Rule Integration by Parts Formula Jennifer Switkes ([email protected]), California State Polytechnic Univer-sity, Pomona, CA 91768